When they come around it is abundantly clear and is always amazing! 1*Foreword, pg. acausal nonlocal meaningful coincidence) is presented with a beautiful calm and eloquence. This work by Jung is a fascinating look at the subjective experience of being a human mind in a physical universe. Reading this book at any other time, it would have been just a weird coincidence, but I wasn't reading this book at another moment of spacetime. It is an attemp … Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. On the other hand, Synchronicity confronts issues that seem scientifically unresolvable, such as Plato’s theory of transcendent forms and the question of whether mathematics demonstrates a priori meaning. We are made by history.” So, this January, as we celebrate Martin Luther King... To see what your friends thought of this book. Jung coined the word to describe what he called “temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events.” Jung variously described synchronicity as an “acausal connecting (togetherness) principle”, “meaningful coincidence” and “acausal parallelism”. Carl Gustav Jung coined the word to describe what he called "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events." Since the notion of causality cannot explain the occurrence of meaningful, connected experiences, Jung hopes to find a separate principle of explanation -- an "acausal orderedness." A fascinating, but unscientific, examination of affective coincidences. Jung In Synchronicity Jung attempts to outline a principle of reality that operates beyond the natural laws of physics. But the Philosophy and Historical Background to the notions of Synchronistic Events I found to be most interesting, knowing also that our own Emotional State can have a larger influence on our Awareness then previously thought is another rather liberating point as well. Jung's concept of synchronicity (i.e. I had a dream the other night in which I was at a conference with a group of people; the only familiar face was that of my thesis supervisor, but I appeared to know the other people as well. Jung also explains why his theory goes beyond the "primitive" idea of assumed belief in the meaningfulness of events (e.g. 8. of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung) (Bollingen Series XX: The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Volume 8) [Carl Jung and Excerpts from Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle] I do not regard these statements as in any way a final proof of my views, but… Lotu Tii And maybe it's the translation from the original German at fault, but I have the distinct sense now that Jung wants to have his cake and eat it; if something is "connected" does this not imply causality? As if just by putting a name on the inexplicable, that somehow makes it explained. We've all had various experiences that seemed almost impossible chance connections. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. SYNCHRONICITY An Acausal Connecting Principle Jung. To top it off, one morning. He begins the book with the following statements: The best part: the explanation of why meaningful coincidences are, indeed, meaningful - because all our lines of connection come from the same source. This was the first book I had ever read by him though I had read several books about him. Moreover, Jung's reliance both on astrology and on J.B. Rhine's unreproducible ‘psychophysical’ experiments seems very problematic to me. The experimental chapter I found to be a bit confusing, but since I am not the best at math that might explain why. But the Parts 3 and 4 addressing similarities between Synchronicity and certain aspects of the world as explained in Lao-tzu’s. Little did I know, starting to read this book on the winter solstice, how synchronicitious my life would become while reading. I must say that thought the famous psychiatrist and writer of the soul and this topic are truly compelling, reading Jung himself is difficult in that his language is awkward and not written for a general lay audience. Probably would have given this a higher rating if I had understood it better. Part 2, which is the so-called simple astrological experiment Jung conducted to test his theory, is all statistical math and thus incomprehensible to me. The book was also published in 1985 by Routledge . The works of Jung, I think are highly imaginative. What is the empirical statistical evidence for astrology? (Bollingen Series LI) [C.G. However, I actually found myself less persuaded about the concept after reading Jung's book than before. Or a new to Jung person? He gives an account of an experience regarding fish (meaningful as an archetypal symbol), where he either saw an actual fish, is told about a fish, sees a drawing of a fish, etc, all within a short space of time. Anyone?|. He gives an account of an experience regarding fish (meaningful as an archetypal symbol), where he either saw an actual fish, is told about a fish, sees a drawing of a fish, etc, all within a short space of time. Synchronicity is acausal. Jung hems and haws but is never able to demonstrate that any acausal connection between events exists. I'm still impressed that Jung obtained the opinions of such notables as Wolfgang Pauli in support of his argument, though. Yet it is an idea that I believe is needed in light of 21st Century Perception of the World as a world that participants with Consciousness and is not separated from it. Jung proposes the possibility of an acausal relationship between events. In a certain mood one notices that the crows fly towards the left. 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files.